Skip to content
FedRAMP Rules Hub
JSON — GET /api/baseline

Keyboard shortcuts

Go

  • Scope — the control cataloggm
  • Plan — your last certification classgp
  • Collect — the recipe indexgc
  • The control you are workinggw
  • Startgh

Move

  • Next rowj
  • Previous rowk
  • Previous in this run[
  • Next in this run]
  • Filter this page's list/
  • Search everything⌘K

Act

  • Copy this page's permalinky
  • Toggle dark moded
  • This sheet?

Rows are whatever the current page lists — controls on Scope, recipes on Plan and Collect.

Control index

PS-08 Personnel Sanctionsps-8

JSON — GET /api/baselineMD — /control/ps-8.md — this page as markdown, for pasting into an agent

Whether an AWS call fetches evidence for this control, and what to run. Its Rev5 baselines, the indicators that reach it and the FedRAMP guidance attached to it open below.

Nothing names itNo recipe names PS-08. 1 reach an indicator it shares, which is adjacency and not coverage — worth reading, not worth recording as evidence for this control.

Collect evidence (0)

Authored AWS recipes whose output is evidence for PS-08. This mapping is this project’s opinion (overlay v3.0.0), versioned separately from the dataset — the upstream FedRAMP rules name none of these tools.

No authored recipe names PS-08. The nearest authored work is below.

AssessedNo AWS API proves PS-08.

A sanctions process is an HR procedure invoked after a violation; nothing in an AWS account records that it ran.

This project’s assessment (automation register v0.9.0, reviewed 2026-08-04), versioned separately from the dataset and from the evidence overlays. It is an opinion about the AWS surface on that date, and the surface moves.

The KSI that reaches it is KSI-IAM-SUS — which is what asks for it. The evidence it asks for is written, not fetched. Browse /collect for the whole authored corpus.

Reaches the same indicator, not PS-08

These recipes prove a KSI that reaches it. None of them claims PS-08 — treat them as neighbours worth reading, not as coverage.

Class B evidence plan for IAM→

What NIST requires of PS-08

The control statement from NIST 800-53 Rev5, verbatim. Square brackets are organization-defined parameters — yours to set, not FedRAMP's to dictate.

a. Employ a formal sanctions process for individuals failing to comply with established information security and privacy policies and procedures; and b. Notify [personnel or roles] within [time period] when a formal employee sanctions process is initiated, identifying the individual sanctioned and the reason for the sanction.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev5 catalog 5.2.0, from usnistgov/oscal-content at 78650f0. The FedRAMP dataset carries no control text; this is borrowed and pinned.

Rev5 baseline membership

Membership is the whole relationship — a baseline is a set of control ids. Class A carries no baseline at all. The Low/Moderate/High labels are an interpretation from control counts, not a dataset fact.

Class Bour reading: Rev5 Low
in baseline
Class B readiness
Class Cour reading: Rev5 Moderate
in baseline
Class C readiness
Class Dour reading: Rev5 High
in baseline
Class D readiness

KSI indicators reaching this control (1)

Under 20x, these indicators are how this control is demonstrated — automated KSI evidence stands in for narrative control evidence.

Pages exist for the 209 controls reached by at least one KSI. Baseline-only controls are the orphans on /coverage. Control titles and full text live in the NIST catalog, not this dataset.